The next is a visitor publish and opinion from Michael Egorov, Founding father of Curve Finance.
As DeFi edges nearer to mainstream finance, it should steadiness neutrality, safety, and throughput. In 2025, that steadiness is more and more outlined by two competing architectural visions.
The evolution of DeFi has all the time hinged on one core query: what sort of infrastructure will we need to construct the way forward for finance on? Because the house matures and edges towards integration with international monetary methods, the urgency of this query solely intensifies.
In 2025, this resolution is now not purely technical. It’s a contest between two visions: Ethereum’s modular, decentralization-first stack and Solana’s high-performance, monolithic method. The end result will assist decide what the following section of blockchain-based finance seems like—and form the structure of tomorrow’s international monetary methods.
On this article, I share my perspective on how each networks are positioning themselves for the longer term, and which is extra more likely to emerge forward in the long term.
Ethereum: The Basis of Severe DeFi
Ethereum is greater than only a blockchain—it’s the bedrock of recent DeFi. It’s the place safe, composable purposes can thrive and the place long-term monetary infrastructure is being constructed. Institutional gamers flip to Ethereum once they need to tokenize belongings with confidence, and capital flows right here for safety. The truth that over 55% of whole worth locked (TVL) throughout main chains resides on Ethereum attests to its dominance.
Not like Solana’s one-size-fits-all Layer 1, Ethereum has embraced a modular scaling method. Layer 1 stays the core basis, whereas Layer 2s deal with particular workloads resembling micro-transactions or gaming, avoiding congestion on the primary chain. This construction preserves decentralization whereas enabling scale. With the rollout of Proto-Danksharding in early 2025, Layer 2 transaction prices have dropped considerably—cementing Ethereum’s lead in modular structure.
That stated, Ethereum’s mannequin has trade-offs. Its reliance on Layer 2s can introduce fragmentation. Some DeFi primitives must stay on Layer 1 for full composability. Whereas remoted purposes like order ebook DEXs can perform on L2s, these options usually really feel like a short lived repair, not a long-term design. Actually built-in DeFi calls for synchronous, on-chain composability—which works finest when every little thing operates on the identical base layer.
However Ethereum’s biggest power is its uncompromising dedication to decentralization. It is without doubt one of the most politically impartial blockchains in existence—a key trait in an more and more regulated atmosphere. Pace and person expertise will be optimized over time, however decentralization is a founding precept. As soon as compromised, it’s practically unimaginable to revive.
Developer expertise is one other edge. Writing sensible contracts on Ethereum is considerably easier than on Solana, enabling builders to supply safe, well-tested code. This maturity is a part of the explanation why Ethereum builders are snug making contracts immutable—there’s confidence within the safety. It’s no coincidence that just about each main DeFi innovation originated on Ethereum. With over 1,388 deployed protocols in comparison with Solana’s 232, the numbers converse for themselves.
When safety, composability, and developer confidence align, all the ecosystem advantages.
Solana: Quick and Environment friendly, However Centralized
Solana addresses the identical scaling problem from a special angle. Its monolithic structure retains every little thing on a single Layer 1. This gives tangible advantages: extraordinarily quick transactions, low charges, and a seamless person expertise.
From a uncooked efficiency standpoint, Solana is compelling—succesful of processing 3,000–4,000 transactions per second (TPS) in the present day, with expectations of reaching over 1 million TPS via the upcoming Firedancer validator. These numbers, primarily based on testnet outcomes, are spectacular in comparison with Ethereum’s common of 15–30 TPS.
Nevertheless, this efficiency comes with trade-offs. Solana’s design features a chief node that sequences transactions. Whereas this improves throughput, it introduces centralization dangers. The community is distributed, however not actually decentralized. That distinction issues—particularly in a world the place establishments prioritize political neutrality and censorship resistance.
Nonetheless, not each use case requires deep decentralization. For instance, inside CBDCs or consumer-facing purposes in gaming and fintech might profit from Solana’s throughput and UX. I wouldn’t be stunned if we see state-adapted variations of Solana deployed in managed environments.
But regardless of Solana’s momentum, Ethereum stays the platform of selection for what I name “critical cash.”
Structural Soundness vs. Mass Adoption
The core DeFi debate in 2025—and past—facilities on what the sector ought to optimize for: structural integrity or mass adoption? Ought to we construct resilient, decentralized, and composable methods, even when they’re slower and extra advanced? Or prioritize scale and UX on the expense of core crypto values?
Chasing adoption with out structural soundness is short-sighted. If protocols compromise on safety or decentralization, regulators will inevitably impose the identical constraints that burden conventional finance. At that time, the promise of DeFi could be misplaced.
That’s why institutional capital continues to favor Ethereum—and why I consider that desire will maintain. Neutrality and safety can’t be retrofitted; they should be constructed into the bottom layer from the beginning.
If we would like DeFi to outlast the hype cycles and kind the spine of a brand new international monetary order, Ethereum gives essentially the most sturdy path ahead. It provides us the most effective shot at constructing monetary rails which can be resilient, safe, and unco-optable.